Solution
For many years, Nepal was a Hindu kingdom in the past and later a constitutional monarchy in the modern era. Throughout this time, Nepalese political parties and the general public have wished for a more open and responsive government. However, with the support of the army, the king maintained complete control over the government and limited the spread of democracy in Nepal. However, after a strong movement for democracy, the king agreed to a new democratic constitution in 1990. Democratic governments, on the other hand, had a brief and tumultuous existence. During the 1990s, Nepalese Maoists, who believed in violent insurgency against the monarchy and ruling elite, fought tooth and nail against the king's armed forces. In addition, there was a triangular fight between monarchists, democrats, and Maoists.
The king disbanded the parliament and fired the government in 2002, effectively destroying Nepal's limited democracy. Massive pro-democracy protests erupted across the country in April 2006. When the king was obliged to reinstall the House of Representatives, which had been dissolved in April 2002, the beleaguered pro-democracy forces scored their first major win. The Seven Party Alliance (SPA), Maoists, and social activists led the largely nonviolent movement. To draught the constitution, Nepal convened a constituent assembly. The Maoist organisations agreed to put their armed struggle on hold. They desired that the constitution include significant social and economic transformation programmes. The Maoists and other political organisations were also wary of the Indian government and its role in the conflict.